It looks for the five differences
In the Mutant Days of the UBU, it was a subject on which I believe that passage of finishing nails. I could not avoid to notice a certain distrust of the journalists towards the blogueros. In Geek in Love it is where better I have seen explained, the differences and the complementarinesses between both .unions.
The distrust comes from not having nor idea than he is blog and clearly! how they are going to recognize it! , the unique way is to create one or to visit others frequently, we know all it because that is what we do, for the rest of nonblogeros humans, blog is a page opinion Web, always is scared than it is not known, they lose it. ;)
My question is to be bloguero bitacorero it is to be friki also? ; P
it points this entrance, Blogófago: we will need it shortly.
.
I have liked very much the example. It is wonderful.
when somebody recelaaaaa, usually has to do whereupon he is conscious of kindness of the other part in which he, surely, cannot contribute. The distrust is logical, sabel that they become blogs wonderful , like this for example.
The similarity of the journalist with Urdaci, is accidental?
.
I because I remove a similarity to him to Napoleon, .to the Napoleon of all the life, not to Sarcozy.
And removing seemed it is not looked the bloguero like Mr. K?
eye that the good stews sometimes create spectacular flatulences.
jejeje
to continue making stews.
Slight piece of post!
I do not want to be pedantic, but the Internet phenomenon is of a dimension similar to the invention of the press. Each of us we can say freely what we thought and to be read!
The journalist is the professional who dedicates itself to create the news of some subjects Walks, that does not have retranca the phrase
.
While they gain the life writing, the other gain friendships and, frequently, they lose the time visiting other places and commenting.
Totally in agreement although there is blogeros and also blogeros journalists and journalist and.
As it says Pedro keeps the entrance.
Mr. Blogófago, am becoming a stereotype and I without knowing it? I will have to register my image to the style raise-plant-profile?
On the raised subject, because not much more that to add. To insist on which many of the journalists with voice are illiterate technological. Their attacks against the blogosfera are comprehensible therefore. In the long run they will be ended up adapting. They do not have left another one.
The confrontation blogueros-journalists does not have why to become fierce. In the end, all we sailed in the same virtual boat.
Neither all the blogueros we are cool nor all the journalists continue writing machine.
Some journalists never learned types. The system of writing in denominated keyboard vulture (the indices give returns on the keys until they hurry on the chosen one), also is known by method journalist . Rotten confession done by several lawyers in Sciences of the Information.
Returning to which Blogófago proposes, the debate seems to me something sterile. There is people who in private of her shower intone better than many professionals of the song. It has commercial that at the time to day interprets with more conviction than consecrated actors. In pachangas in beaches of Cadiz I have seen talludita people make things with the ball that really does not repeat *inho in a field. But a musician, an actor and a soccer player are professional and happen pay and quotes with their work.
Empapucémonos of blogs and we devoured press. The one is the sauce and the other the protein.
I create who the opinion would have to come than I define to blogger 2,0 : the one that frequents blogs to cascoporro but does not have blog, that consumes so much more or than the blogueros 1,0 (those that they maintain blog, it is understood) but has an external vision. That is the one that would have to think if the work of the journalist is better or the one of the amateur .
And, if, for my the bitacorero is friki. Taken care of with him.